Dreamweaver VS Aptana Studio
Has attracted support from many users of the Adobe as the de facto standard for creating websites Dreamweaver, but recently, the open source Aptana Studio is also popular. I also said in the open-source advocates, as much as possible, Aptana Studio is that we use, also Dreamweaver and sometimes that's not only the facts. Been able to do, or what not, I would like to compare the major features in the center.
| Compare items | Dreamweaver | Aptana Studio |
|---|---|---|
| DWT handling | ○ | × |
| Deforutofamatto specified (XHTML1.0, etc.) | ○ | ○ |
| Working with image editing software | ○ | × |
| FTP Settings | ○ (automatic upload storage) | ○ (manually upload storage) |
| Test server configuration | ○ | × |
| Corresponding Subversion repository | ○ | ○ |
As can be seen from the above HTML / CSS-based website revealed if Dreamweaver would work better efficient. Meanwhile, Aptana Studio is an Eclipse software because it is derived, Adobe Air, Ruby, Python, Jython and good at handling a variety of other languages. Also, being able to edit the database, CMS I'd prefer it to the user.
Dreamweaver How to take full advantage of that is not, including me, many people in the DWT Dreamweaver should feel the greatest benefit. Therefore, DWT does not require the production of CMS or Aptana Studio DWT is not what the transfer would be relatively easy to support.
In addition, the relationship will increase the cost of licensing issues. Dreamweaver per license and is about 4-5 million yen, Aptana Studio is free. What do you think the balance between individual differences in the cost and you should have some features, Aptana Studio is open source more than the next, DWT and also likely to respond, no doubt further enhancement.
